<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scholten Fant: Attorneys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholtenfant.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholtenfant.com</link>
	<description>Attorneys</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 18:11:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Scholten Fant Attorneys Named to Top 20 Under 40 List</title>
		<link>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2013/02/scholten-fant-attorneys-named-to-top-20-under-40-list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2013/02/scholten-fant-attorneys-named-to-top-20-under-40-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>harvey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholtenfant.com/?p=1969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congratulations to Brad Fisher, Ryan Keenan and Eric Post for being named in the Business Times as a Top 20 Under 40 Business Professional for 2013! Business Times &#8211; Winter 2013]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to<a title="Bradley J. Fisher" href="http://www.scholtenfant.com/attorneys/bradley-j-fisher/" target="_blank"> Brad Fisher</a>, <a title="Ryan C. Keenan" href="http://www.scholtenfant.com/attorneys/ryan-c-keenan/" target="_blank">Ryan Keenan</a> and <a title="Eric R. Post" href="http://www.scholtenfant.com/attorneys/eric-r-post/" target="_blank">Eric Post</a> for being named in the Business Times as a Top 20 Under 40 Business Professional for 2013!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ifoldsflip.com/title/11367?utm_source=January+14%2C+2013&amp;utm_campaign=January+14%2C+2013&amp;utm_medium=email" target="_blank">Business Times &#8211; Winter 2013</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2013/02/scholten-fant-attorneys-named-to-top-20-under-40-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRA Alert</title>
		<link>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2013/01/ira-alert/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2013/01/ira-alert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 22:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>harvey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholtenfant.com/?p=1925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fiscal Cliff Tax Law contains provisions which extend the IRA charitable direct transfer rule through 2013, and retroactive provisions for 2012.  These rollover provisions allow individuals age 70 ½ or older to make direct transfers from their IRAs to qualified charitable organizations. THERE ARE TWO SPECIAL OPPORTUNITIES THAT EXPIRE AT THE END OF THIS [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The Fiscal Cliff Tax Law contains provisions which extend the IRA charitable direct transfer rule through 2013, and retroactive provisions for 2012.  These rollover provisions allow individuals age 70 ½ or older to make direct transfers from their IRAs to qualified charitable organizations.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>THERE ARE TWO SPECIAL OPPORTUNITIES THAT EXPIRE AT THE END OF THIS MONTH.</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>You can make a direct distribution between now and January 31, 2013 from your IRA to a charity and then elect to have that distribution considered to have been made on December 31, 2012.</li>
<li>If you received your IRA required minimum distribution in December 2012 and you made or will make a cash gift to a charity between the December receipt of your distribution and January 31, 2013, your gift will qualify as a direct IRA transfer for the 2012 calendar year to the extent it does not exceed the amount of the distribution you received.</p>
</li>
</ol>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Please keep in mind the following points as you consider a direct IRA transfer to a charity.</p>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>You must be 70 ½ or older on the date of transfer.</li>
<li>The total maximum distribution per person is $100,000.</li>
<li>Distributions can be made only from a traditional or Roth IRA.  Other retirement plans, such as pensions, 401(k) plans, and other similar plans are not eligible.</li>
<li>The distribution must go directly to the charity from your IRA administrator.</li>
<li>There is no charitable deduction, but the amount sent to the charity is excluded from your adjusted gross income, is not subject to gift limitations, and is not taxed when received by the charity.</p>
</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This is only a brief summary.  If you wish to pursue this, please contact us for additional information and details.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>SCHOLTEN FANT ESTATE PLANNING GROUP</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2013/01/ira-alert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ESTATE TAX ALERT</title>
		<link>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2013/01/estate-tax-alert/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2013/01/estate-tax-alert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>harvey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholtenfant.com/?p=1922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news. As you no doubt know, Congress has approved a tax bill in response to the fiscal cliff. Based on news media reports, the estate tax provisions include a per person estate tax credit amount (exemption) of $5,000,000. This amount is indexed for inflation. The estate tax rate is a flat 40% on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news. As you no doubt know, Congress has approved a tax bill in response to the fiscal cliff. Based on news media reports, the estate tax provisions include a per person estate tax credit amount (exemption) of $5,000,000. This amount is indexed for inflation. The estate tax rate is a flat 40% on the amount of the estate in excess of the exemption.</p>
<p>Also the bill includes a continuation of the portability rule which expired December 31, 2012. This rule allows the unused exemption at the death of the first spouse to be transferred to the surviving spouse. This means spouses will have a total combined exemption of $10,000,000, which can be utilized without the need for a trust to be established at the death of the first spouse or a need to split assets between spouses.</p>
<p>The changes are being characterized as “permanent.” This just means there is no expiration date, as has been previously the case for all estate tax law changes from 2000 on. Amendment of the estate tax law at a later date is still always possible.</p>
<p>If these changes had not been made, beginning this year the exemption would have become $1,000,000 per person and the estate tax rate would have been as high as 55%.</p>
<p>In the coming weeks we will be reviewing and analyzing the fine print in the bill. We then plan to be in contact with you by letter if we conclude your estate planning should be reviewed and/or revised to take account of the tax bill. In the meantime, if you have questions, please call.</p>
<p>As always, if you have had significant family or financial changes since we last worked with you on your estate planning, please contact us.  Also, we suggest a review every three to five years.</p>
<p><em>Scholten Fant Estate Planning Group</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2013/01/estate-tax-alert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The DREAM Act – What Schools Need to Know</title>
		<link>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2012/11/the-dream-act-%e2%80%93-what-schools-need-to-know/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2012/11/the-dream-act-%e2%80%93-what-schools-need-to-know/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 22:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>harvey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[School Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholtenfant.com/?p=1900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The DREAM Act (Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors) is proposed bipartisan legislation to provide qualifying undocumented youth a conditional path to US citizenship.  After the DREAM Act failed to pass, President Obama issued a statement on June 15, 2012, setting forth the focus his administration will take on immigration enforcement. In particular, President [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The <span style="color: #000000;"><a href="http://dreamact.info/" target="_blank">DREAM Act</a></span> (Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors) is proposed bipartisan legislation to provide qualifying undocumented youth a conditional path to US citizenship.  After the DREAM Act <span style="color: #000000;"><a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&amp;session=2&amp;vote=00278" target="_blank">failed to pass</a></span>, President Obama issued a<span style="color: #000000;"> <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/06/15/remarks-president-immigration" target="_blank">statement on June 15, 2012</a>,</span> setting forth the focus his administration will take on immigration enforcement. In particular, President Obama stated that in the “next few months, eligible individuals who do not present a risk to national security or public safety will be able to<span style="color: #000000;"> <a href="http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=f2ef2f19470f7310VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&amp;vgnextchannel=f2ef2f19470f7310VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD" target="_blank">request temporary relief</a> f</span>rom deportation proceedings and apply for work authorization.” This approach is not meant as a permanent fix, but is, in President Obama’s words, “a temporary stop-gap measure that lets us focus our resources wisely while giving a degree of relief and hope to talented, driving, patriotic young people.”  The future of the DREAM Act is still undecided. There may be changes in the proposed legislation, and it may or may not pass as Congress revisits the immigration issue often.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">For now, here is what schools need to know: Undocumented youth applying for this deferred action need <span style="color: #000000;"><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/08/15/deferred-action-childhood-arrivals-who-can-be-considered" target="_blank">proof of certain requirements</a></span>, such as enrollment in or graduation from school, and a continuous presence in the United States for five years.  Students may ask a school for assistance in proving some of these requirements through school records.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Some of the items a school may provide include the following: school issued photo identification; school transcripts or report cards showing the name of the school and time period of attendance; high school diploma or GED certificate.  Other items that may be helpful could include awards or recognitions provided by the school that contain the name of the school, student, and date. Original or certified documents are not necessary unless specifically requested by<span style="color: #000000;"> <a href="http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis" target="_blank">U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services</a></span>.</p>
<p>If you have questions on turning over certain records, what you can and cannot do for the student, and how <span style="color: #000000;"><a href="http://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/index.html" target="_blank">FERPA</a> </span>applies, please contact one of our school law attorneys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2012/11/the-dream-act-%e2%80%93-what-schools-need-to-know/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Durable Powers of Attorney Must Now Be Accompanied By Agent’s Written Acceptance</title>
		<link>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2012/10/durable-powers-of-attorney-must-now-be-accompanied-by-agent%e2%80%99s-written-acceptance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2012/10/durable-powers-of-attorney-must-now-be-accompanied-by-agent%e2%80%99s-written-acceptance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 17:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>harvey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholtenfant.com/?p=1884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beginning October 1, 2012, if you are signing a typical durable power of attorney (DPOA) in Michigan, your designated agent will need to sign a written acknowledgement of his or her duties and responsibilities. This is one of several changes to Michigan law governing DPOAs, which were enacted as Public Act 141 of 2012. Another [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beginning October 1, 2012, if you are signing a typical durable power of attorney (DPOA) in Michigan, your designated agent will need to sign a written acknowledgement of his or her duties and responsibilities.  This is one of several changes to Michigan law governing DPOAs, which were enacted as Public Act 141 of 2012.  Another change requires DPOAs to be either witnessed by two individuals (neither of whom may be the designated agent) or acknowledged before a notary. </p>
<p>A power of attorney is an instrument given by an individual (the “principal”) to a designated agent (or “attorney-in-fact”) which allows the agent to act on behalf of the principal, such as the authority to manage the principal’s business and financial affairs, including banking matters, signing a deed, making investments, paying bills, etc.  DPOAs are typically utilized when a principal is incapacitated or unable to act on his/her own.</p>
<p>The new requirements do not apply to DPOAs signed prior to October 1, 2012.  However, even if you have an pre-existing power of attorney, banks and other financial institutions may nevertheless require your designated agent to sign an acknowledgement of his/her duties and responsibilities.</p>
<p>In addition, the law exempts certain specific types of powers of attorney from the new requirements, including powers of attorney which are given for a business or commercial purpose, executed as a part of a loan agreement, or those which relate to health care decisions for the principal (which are governed under a separate law).</p>
<p>If you have any questions regarding these changes in the law, an existing power of attorney, or whether you should execute a new power of attorney, please contact any one of Scholten Fant’s experienced estate planning attorneys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2012/10/durable-powers-of-attorney-must-now-be-accompanied-by-agent%e2%80%99s-written-acceptance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IN MEMORIAM ~ MICHAEL L. BEVINS (1958 &#8211; 2012)</title>
		<link>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2012/08/in-memoriam-michael-l-bevins-1958-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2012/08/in-memoriam-michael-l-bevins-1958-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 13:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>harvey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholtenfant.com/?p=1856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scholten Fant sadly notes the passing of Michael L. Bevins, on August 3, 2012, just 20 days after Bruce P. Rissi, another Scholten Fant partner, died of brain cancer.  Michael&#8217;s courageous fight with cancer is over, and we extend deep sympathy to his family and friends.  Michael L. Bevins passed away on August 3, 2012, at the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Scholten Fant sadly notes the passing of Michael L. Bevins, on August 3, 2012, just 20 days after Bruce P. Rissi, another Scholten Fant partner, died of brain cancer.  Michael&#8217;s courageous fight with cancer is over, and we extend deep sympathy to his family and friends. </em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Michael L. Bevins</em> </strong>passed away on August 3, 2012, at the age of 54, after a courageous battle with cancer. His family includes his parents, John (Sandy) Blair of Sparta, GA; his daughter, Brie Rantala of El Paso, TX; his granddaughter, Bella Coleman; his sister, Marlene (Rick) Jackson of Duluth, GA; his brother, Mark (Becky) Willman of Savanna, GA; his fiancée, Mary Pollock of Holland; his nieces and nephews, Kim, Amie, Nathan, Stephen, Ian, and Devin; several grand-nieces and nephews; and his beloved companions, Amber and Jack.</p>
<p>A service will be held at 1 p.m. on Thursday, August 9, at the Clock Chapel-Grand Haven with Rev. Ben Jansen officiating. Visitation will be held from 2 to 4 p.m. and 7 to 9 p.m. on Wednesday at Clock Life Story Funeral Home &#8211; Grand Haven. Memorials may be made to the American Cancer Society-Research or the Hospice.  For more information we provide the following link:  <a href="http://www.lifestorynet.com/memories/82331">http://www.lifestorynet.com/memories/82331</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2012/08/in-memoriam-michael-l-bevins-1958-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IN MEMORIAM ~  BRUCE P. RISSI (1952-2012)</title>
		<link>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2012/07/in-memoriam-bruce-p-rissi-1952-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2012/07/in-memoriam-bruce-p-rissi-1952-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>harvey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholtenfant.com/?p=1846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scholten Fant sadly notes the passing of Bruce P. Rissi on July 14, 2012. His courageous fight with brain cancer is over, and we extend deep sympathy to his family and friends. Following is his obituary. Bruce P. Rissi, age 59, passed away at The Poppen House in Muskegon, MI on Saturday, July 14, 2012. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Scholten Fant sadly notes the passing of Bruce P. Rissi on July 14, 2012. His courageous fight with brain cancer is over, and we extend deep sympathy to his family and friends. Following is his obituary.</em></strong></p>
<p><strong>Bruce P. Rissi</strong>, age 59, passed away at The Poppen House in Muskegon, MI on Saturday, July 14, 2012. Bruce was born on December 27, 1952 and was a resident of Whitehall, MI. He is survived by his wife of 27 years, Valerie K. Rissi; one daughter, Connie (Dan) Sparrow; two sons, Jacob and James (Mitch) Rissi; two granddaughters, Madeline and Mckenzie; two grandsons, Nathan and Corbin; three brothers and one sister, Charles (Gloria) Rissi, Paul (Gayle) Rissi, Donn (Debby) Rissi, Marie Coffey (Jerry); and numerous extended family members and friends. In lieu of flowers, memorial gifts may be directed to The Community Foundation for Muskegon County, 425 W. Western Ave., Ste 200, Muskegon, MI 49440 where the &#8216;Rissi Glioblastoma&#8217; fund has been established to honor Bruce’s life. A memorial tribute will be held on Monday, July 23, 2012 at 8:00 P.M. at the Duck Lake Channel on Scenic Dr., located 1/2 mile north of Duck Lake Rd. in Whitehall, MI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2012/07/in-memoriam-bruce-p-rissi-1952-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deduction of Union Dues Revisited &#8211; Yet Again</title>
		<link>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2012/04/deduction-of-union-dues-revisited-yet-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2012/04/deduction-of-union-dues-revisited-yet-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>harvey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[School Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholtenfant.com/?p=1780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Act 53 of 2012 was filed on March 16 and given “immediate effect.”  It prohibited a public school employer from payroll deduction and transmission (to the union) of union dues or service fees, unless required to do so under the terms of an unexpired collective bargaining agreement (CBA). On April 2, the Ingham County Circuit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Act 53 of 2012 was filed on March 16 and given “immediate effect.”  It prohibited a public school employer from payroll deduction and transmission (to the union) of union dues or service fees, unless required to do so under the terms of an unexpired collective bargaining agreement (CBA).</p>
<p>On April 2, the Ingham County Circuit Court issued a preliminary injunction which halted Act 53’s “immediate effect” while judicial challenges to it were pending.  Therefore, the Act’s prohibition against the deduction of union dues became inapplicable, at least temporarily.</p>
<p>Most recently, however, on April 9, the Michigan Court of Appeals overturned the Ingham County Circuit Court’s preliminary injunction and reinstated Act 53’s “immediate effect,” while judicial challenges and appeals are pending.  Therefore, public school employers should once again refrain from the payroll deduction of union dues or service fees unless obligated to do so pursuant to an existing and unexpired CBA.</p>
<p>There will obviously be further developments as the pending litigation progresses.  If you have questions regarding this evolving issue in the meantime, however, please contact one of our school law attorneys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2012/04/deduction-of-union-dues-revisited-yet-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: Act 53 (Recent Dues Legislation) Put on Hold</title>
		<link>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2012/04/update-act-53-recent-dues-legislation-put-on-hold/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2012/04/update-act-53-recent-dues-legislation-put-on-hold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>harvey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[School Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholtenfant.com/?p=1721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Ingham County Circuit Court has just (on April 2, 2012) issued a preliminary injunction which essentially suspends Act 53’s “immediate effect.”  Therefore, pending further developments, school districts are not currently prohibited from the payroll deduction of union dues by Act 53.  Further judicial proceedings, and therefore further direction, will be forthcoming.  In the meantime, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">The Ingham County Circuit Court has just (on April 2, 2012) issued a preliminary injunction which essentially suspends Act 53’s “immediate effect.”  Therefore, pending further developments, school districts are not currently prohibited from the payroll deduction of union dues by Act 53.  Further judicial proceedings, and therefore further direction, will be forthcoming.  In the meantime, however, Act 53 should for now be disregarded.  Please contact any of our school law attorneys with any remaining questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2012/04/update-act-53-recent-dues-legislation-put-on-hold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NEW LAW PROHIBITS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS FROM COLLECTING UNION DUES</title>
		<link>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2012/03/new-law-prohibits-public-school-districts-from-collecting-union-dues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2012/03/new-law-prohibits-public-school-districts-from-collecting-union-dues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>harvey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[School Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholtenfant.com/?p=1652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Governor Snyder recently signed into law an amendment to the Public Employee Relations Act (“PERA”) that prohibits public school districts from collecting union dues or service fees. As you may know, PERA historically prohibited a public employer, as well as an officer or an agent of a public employer, from initiating, creating, dominating, contributing to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Governor Snyder recently signed into law an amendment to the Public Employee Relations Act (“PERA”) that prohibits public school districts from collecting union dues or service fees. As you may know, PERA historically prohibited a public employer, as well as an officer or an agent of a public employer, from initiating, creating, dominating, contributing to or interfering with the formation or administration of any labor organization. The new law, <a href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2011-2012/publicact/pdf/2012-PA-0053.pdf">Public Act 53 of 2012</a>, amends PERA, to specifically indicate: “A public school employer’s use of public school resources to assist a labor organization in collecting dues or service fees from wages of public school employees is a prohibited contribution to the administration of a labor organization.”</p>
<p>While the new law takes immediate effect, there is a provision that allows a public school employer to continue to collect union dues and service fees pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement that was in effect on March 16, 2012, up until that collective bargaining agreement expires, or is terminated, extended or renewed.</p>
<p>For school districts in the process of negotiating an expired contract, the school district should immediately cease collecting dues or service fees under the expired contract. This should be accomplished with the next payroll process following March 16, 2012. The school district should also consider giving the union prior notice of its intent to comply with the law as a matter of common professional courtesy.</p>
<p>Please note the prohibition on collecting union dues will likely be subjected to a legal challenge, especially since it singles out schools as opposed to being applied to all public employers. We’ll keep you posted on the outcome of any such legal challenge.</p>
<p>If you have any questions regarding the effects of this new law, or any other school law issue, please contact one of our school law attorneys.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholtenfant.com/2012/03/new-law-prohibits-public-school-districts-from-collecting-union-dues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
